[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150803114104.GK25159@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 13:41:04 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, arc-linux-dev@...opsys.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARCv2: spinlock/rwlock/atomics: Delayed retry of
failed SCOND with exponential backoff
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 03:33:07PM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> +#define SCOND_FAIL_RETRY_VAR_DEF \
> + unsigned int delay = 1, tmp; \
> +
> +#define SCOND_FAIL_RETRY_ASM \
> + " bz 4f \n" \
> + " ; --- scond fail delay --- \n" \
> + " mov %[tmp], %[delay] \n" /* tmp = delay */ \
> + "2: brne.d %[tmp], 0, 2b \n" /* while (tmp != 0) */ \
> + " sub %[tmp], %[tmp], 1 \n" /* tmp-- */ \
> + " asl %[delay], %[delay], 1 \n" /* delay *= 2 */ \
> + " b 1b \n" /* start over */ \
> + "4: ; --- success --- \n" \
> +
> +#define SCOND_FAIL_RETRY_VARS \
> + ,[delay] "+&r" (delay),[tmp] "=&r" (tmp) \
> +
> +#define ATOMIC_OP(op, c_op, asm_op) \
> +static inline void atomic_##op(int i, atomic_t *v) \
> +{ \
> + unsigned int val, delay = 1, tmp; \
Maybe use your SCOND_FAIL_RETRY_VAR_DEF ?
> + \
> + __asm__ __volatile__( \
> + "1: llock %[val], [%[ctr]] \n" \
> + " " #asm_op " %[val], %[val], %[i] \n" \
> + " scond %[val], [%[ctr]] \n" \
> + " \n" \
> + SCOND_FAIL_RETRY_ASM \
> + \
> + : [val] "=&r" (val) /* Early clobber to prevent reg reuse */ \
> + SCOND_FAIL_RETRY_VARS \
> + : [ctr] "r" (&v->counter), /* Not "m": llock only supports reg direct addr mode */ \
> + [i] "ir" (i) \
> + : "cc"); \
> +} \
> +
> +#define ATOMIC_OP_RETURN(op, c_op, asm_op) \
> +static inline int atomic_##op##_return(int i, atomic_t *v) \
> +{ \
> + unsigned int val, delay = 1, tmp; \
Idem.
> + \
> + /* \
> + * Explicit full memory barrier needed before/after as \
> + * LLOCK/SCOND thmeselves don't provide any such semantics \
> + */ \
> + smp_mb(); \
> + \
> + __asm__ __volatile__( \
> + "1: llock %[val], [%[ctr]] \n" \
> + " " #asm_op " %[val], %[val], %[i] \n" \
> + " scond %[val], [%[ctr]] \n" \
> + " \n" \
> + SCOND_FAIL_RETRY_ASM \
> + \
> + : [val] "=&r" (val) \
> + SCOND_FAIL_RETRY_VARS \
> + : [ctr] "r" (&v->counter), \
> + [i] "ir" (i) \
> + : "cc"); \
> + \
> + smp_mb(); \
> + \
> + return val; \
> +}
> +#define SCOND_FAIL_RETRY_VAR_DEF \
> + unsigned int delay, tmp; \
> +
> +#define SCOND_FAIL_RETRY_ASM \
> + " ; --- scond fail delay --- \n" \
> + " mov %[tmp], %[delay] \n" /* tmp = delay */ \
> + "2: brne.d %[tmp], 0, 2b \n" /* while (tmp != 0) */ \
> + " sub %[tmp], %[tmp], 1 \n" /* tmp-- */ \
> + " asl %[delay], %[delay], 1 \n" /* delay *= 2 */ \
> + " b 1b \n" /* start over */ \
> + " \n" \
> + "4: ; --- done --- \n" \
> +
> +#define SCOND_FAIL_RETRY_VARS \
> + ,[delay] "=&r" (delay), [tmp] "=&r" (tmp) \
This is looking remarkably similar to the previous ones, why not a
shared header?
> +static inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> + unsigned int val;
> + SCOND_FAIL_RETRY_VAR_DEF;
> +
> + smp_mb();
> +
> + __asm__ __volatile__(
> + "0: mov %[delay], 1 \n"
> + "1: llock %[val], [%[slock]] \n"
> + " breq %[val], %[LOCKED], 1b \n" /* spin while LOCKED */
> + " scond %[LOCKED], [%[slock]] \n" /* acquire */
> + " bz 4f \n" /* done */
> + " \n"
> + SCOND_FAIL_RETRY_ASM
But,... in the case that macro is empty, the label 4 does not actually
exist. I see no real reason for this to be different from the previous
incarnation either.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists