[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <EB2039AE-8999-4D0F-9602-CA5ACF3F66BA@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 10:19:42 +0800
From: yalin wang <yalin.wang2010@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Don Brace <don.brace@...s.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
iss_storagedev@...com, storagedev@...s.com,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [TRIVIAL PATCH] block: Correct misuses of 0x%<decimal>
Ping ?
> On Aug 3, 2015, at 16:56, yalin wang <yalin.wang2010@...il.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On Aug 3, 2015, at 16:03, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 2015-08-03 at 15:25 +0800, yalin wang wrote:
>>>> On Aug 3, 2015, at 04:25, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Correct misuse of 0x%d in logging messages.
>>>>
>> []
>>> why not use like this : dev_dbg(&h->pdev->dev, " Max outstanding
>>> commands = %#x\n” ?
>>> %#x will add 0x prefix automatically .
>>
>> It's generally a consistency thing.
>> A 0 value would be emitted as 0 and not 0x0.
>>
> i try on my ubuntu ,
>
> static int __init throtl_init(void)
> {
> printk("module init test: %#x %p\n", 0, (void *)0x123);
> return 0;
>
> }
>
> module_init(throtl_init);
>
> #uname -a
> Linux ubuntu 3.16.0-38-generic #52~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Fri May 8 09:43:57 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> #dmesg
> [259356.375586] module init test: 0x0 0000000000000123
>
> it seems don’t need 0x%x for 0, just need %#x for all numbers.
> there are lots of use like this, i can change them if needed:
>
> # egrep -r -i '0x%\d*x' . | wc -l
> 11776
>
>
> Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists