[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <67B9124A-73E8-4AA1-81E5-18FAC69D3962@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 16:56:36 +0800
From: yalin wang <yalin.wang2010@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Don Brace <don.brace@...s.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
iss_storagedev@...com, storagedev@...s.com,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [TRIVIAL PATCH] block: Correct misuses of 0x%<decimal>
> On Aug 3, 2015, at 16:03, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2015-08-03 at 15:25 +0800, yalin wang wrote:
>>> On Aug 3, 2015, at 04:25, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Correct misuse of 0x%d in logging messages.
>>>
> []
>> why not use like this : dev_dbg(&h->pdev->dev, " Max outstanding
>> commands = %#x\n” ?
>> %#x will add 0x prefix automatically .
>
> It's generally a consistency thing.
> A 0 value would be emitted as 0 and not 0x0.
>
i try on my ubuntu ,
static int __init throtl_init(void)
{
printk("module init test: %#x %p\n", 0, (void *)0x123);
return 0;
}
module_init(throtl_init);
#uname -a
Linux ubuntu 3.16.0-38-generic #52~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Fri May 8 09:43:57 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
#dmesg
[259356.375586] module init test: 0x0 0000000000000123
it seems don’t need 0x%x for 0, just need %#x for all numbers.
there are lots of use like this, i can change them if needed:
# egrep -r -i '0x%\d*x' . | wc -l
11776
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists