linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH-v5 5/5] i2c: pxa: Add ILCR (tLow & tHigh) configuration support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55C1CE8E.9000601@linaro.org>
Date:	Wed, 05 Aug 2015 14:21:26 +0530
From:	Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@...aro.org>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
CC:	robert.jarzmik@...e.fr, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	wsa@...-dreams.de, "Jett.Zhou" <jtzhou@...vell.com>,
	Yi Zhang <yizhang@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-v5 5/5] i2c: pxa: Add ILCR (tLow & tHigh) configuration
 support



On Tuesday 21 July 2015 06:11 PM, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
> With addition of PXA910 family of devices, the TWSI module supports
> SCL clock adjustment using ILCR register.
>
> This patch enables the control and configuration of ICLR through DT
> properties,
>
> i2c-sclk-high-time-ns:
>    SCLK high time (tHigh), for standard/fast/high speed mode
> i2c-sclk-low-time-ns:
>    SCLK low time (tLow), for standard/fast/high speed mode
>
> Note that in case of standard and fast mod, the tLow and tHigh counters
> are same, and software will use tLow value.
>
> Also, brought up devm_clk_get() fn above i2c_pxa_probe_dt(), as it
> uses clk rate for timing calculations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jett.Zhou <jtzhou@...vell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Zhang <yizhang@...vell.com>
> ---
>   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>

Robert,

It would be helpful if you can test this patch-series and confirm that
it now fixes the NULL pointer deference issue.

Thanks,
Vaibhav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/