[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150805085126.GB23169@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:51:27 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] x86/vm86: Add a separate config option for hardware
IRQ handling
* Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
> >> Disabling even less-used code that could have system stability impact. We've
> >> discouraged user-mode drivers for a very long time. Ironically, other than
> >> being configured through the vm86 syscall, there isn't really anything
> >> vm86-specific about it. All it does is register an IRQ handler that sends a
> >> signal to the task.
> >
> > So is this actually used by anything? Could we get away with disabling it,
> > just to see whether anything cares?
>
> My best guess would be some very old X11 drivers that needed interrupts to run
> the Video BIOS code.
So let's keep it - but not complicate it with another layer of disabling logic.
People that rely on legacies will enable vm86 as a single block - they won't
necessarily know how deeply they rely on it.
What _would_ be useful is to have a 3-mode vm86 sysctl:
1: enabled
0: disabled
-1: disabled permanently (one-shot disabling after bootup)
That way a distro can permanently disable vm86 for a particular bootup by setting
it to -1 in /etc/sysctl.conf.
The kernel should default that setting to '0'.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists