[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55C212F6.40504@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 15:43:18 +0200
From: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@...ium.com>,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi, property: Export acpi_dev_prop_read_single call.
On 05.08.2015 15:48, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 04, 2015 04:01:59 PM David Daney wrote:
>> From: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>
>>
>> Fixes the following build error when building drivers as modules:
>>
>> ERROR: "acpi_dev_prop_read_single" [drivers/net/phy/mdio-octeon.ko] undefined!
>> ERROR: "acpi_dev_prop_read_single" [drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/thunder_bgx.ko] undefined!
>
> Can you please tell me why the drivers in question use that function
> directly, although they aren't supposed to?
>
> Clearly, their authors had not tried to build them as modules or they
> would have noticed the problem at the development stage already.
>
> What would be wrong with using the generic device properties API instead?
>
Yes, you are right. We should use:
int device_property_read_u64_array(struct device *dev, const char
*propname, u64 *val, size_t nval);
Regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists