linux-kernel - [PATCH] sb_edac: fix TAD presence check for sbridge_mci_bind

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1438798561-10180-1-git-send-email-sjenning@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed,  5 Aug 2015 13:16:01 -0500
From:	Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>
To:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>
Cc:	Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Aristeu Rozanski <aris@...hat.com>, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] sb_edac: fix TAD presence check for sbridge_mci_bind_devs()

In 7d375bff, NUM_CHANNELS was changed to 8 and the channel space was
renumerated to handle EN, EP, and EX configurations.

The *_mci_bind_devs functions, except for sbridge_mci_bind_devs(), got a
new device presence check in the form of saw_chan_mask.  However,
sbridge_mci_bind_devs() still uses the NUM_CHANNELS for loop.

With the increase in NUM_CHANNELS, this loop fails at index 4 since
SB only has 4 TADs.  This results in the following error on SB machines:

EDAC sbridge: Some needed devices are missing
EDAC sbridge: Couldn't find mci handler
EDAC sbridge: Couldn't find mci handle

This patch adapts the saw_chan_mask logic for sbridge_mci_bind_devs() as
well.

After this patch:

EDAC MC0: Giving out device to module sbridge_edac.c controller Sandy Bridge Socket#0: DEV 0000:3f:0e.0 (POLLED)
EDAC MC1: Giving out device to module sbridge_edac.c controller Sandy Bridge Socket#1: DEV 0000:7f:0e.0 (POLLED)

Signed-off-by: Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>
---
 drivers/edac/sb_edac.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
index ca78311..91cf710 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
@@ -1648,6 +1648,7 @@ static int sbridge_mci_bind_devs(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
 {
 	struct sbridge_pvt *pvt = mci->pvt_info;
 	struct pci_dev *pdev;
+	u8 saw_chan_mask = 0;
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < sbridge_dev->n_devs; i++) {
@@ -1681,6 +1682,7 @@ static int sbridge_mci_bind_devs(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
 		{
 			int id = pdev->device - PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_SBRIDGE_IMC_TAD0;
 			pvt->pci_tad[id] = pdev;
+			saw_chan_mask |= 1 << id;
 		}
 			break;
 		case PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_SBRIDGE_IMC_DDRIO:
@@ -1701,10 +1703,8 @@ static int sbridge_mci_bind_devs(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
 	    !pvt-> pci_tad || !pvt->pci_ras  || !pvt->pci_ta)
 		goto enodev;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < NUM_CHANNELS; i++) {
-		if (!pvt->pci_tad[i])
-			goto enodev;
-	}
+	if (saw_chan_mask != 0x0f)
+		goto enodev;
 	return 0;
 
 enodev:
-- 
2.4.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/