[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150805182036.GW23305@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 14:20:36 -0400
From: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@...hat.com>
To: Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sb_edac: fix TAD presence check for
sbridge_mci_bind_devs()
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 01:16:01PM -0500, Seth Jennings wrote:
> In 7d375bff, NUM_CHANNELS was changed to 8 and the channel space was
> renumerated to handle EN, EP, and EX configurations.
>
> The *_mci_bind_devs functions, except for sbridge_mci_bind_devs(), got a
> new device presence check in the form of saw_chan_mask. However,
> sbridge_mci_bind_devs() still uses the NUM_CHANNELS for loop.
>
> With the increase in NUM_CHANNELS, this loop fails at index 4 since
> SB only has 4 TADs. This results in the following error on SB machines:
>
> EDAC sbridge: Some needed devices are missing
> EDAC sbridge: Couldn't find mci handler
> EDAC sbridge: Couldn't find mci handle
>
> This patch adapts the saw_chan_mask logic for sbridge_mci_bind_devs() as
> well.
>
> After this patch:
>
> EDAC MC0: Giving out device to module sbridge_edac.c controller Sandy Bridge Socket#0: DEV 0000:3f:0e.0 (POLLED)
> EDAC MC1: Giving out device to module sbridge_edac.c controller Sandy Bridge Socket#1: DEV 0000:7f:0e.0 (POLLED)
Acked-by: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@...hat.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/edac/sb_edac.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
> index ca78311..91cf710 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
> @@ -1648,6 +1648,7 @@ static int sbridge_mci_bind_devs(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
> {
> struct sbridge_pvt *pvt = mci->pvt_info;
> struct pci_dev *pdev;
> + u8 saw_chan_mask = 0;
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < sbridge_dev->n_devs; i++) {
> @@ -1681,6 +1682,7 @@ static int sbridge_mci_bind_devs(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
> {
> int id = pdev->device - PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_SBRIDGE_IMC_TAD0;
> pvt->pci_tad[id] = pdev;
> + saw_chan_mask |= 1 << id;
> }
> break;
> case PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_SBRIDGE_IMC_DDRIO:
> @@ -1701,10 +1703,8 @@ static int sbridge_mci_bind_devs(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
> !pvt-> pci_tad || !pvt->pci_ras || !pvt->pci_ta)
> goto enodev;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < NUM_CHANNELS; i++) {
> - if (!pvt->pci_tad[i])
> - goto enodev;
> - }
> + if (saw_chan_mask != 0x0f)
> + goto enodev;
> return 0;
>
> enodev:
> --
> 2.4.3
>
--
Aristeu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists