linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: Only enable IO window if supported

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55C2C4F4.1040600@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Wed, 05 Aug 2015 19:22:44 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: Only enable IO window if supported

On 08/05/2015 06:38 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> It only can avoid warning with bridge, and still have warning on
>> devices under the bridge.
>>
>> also would have problem on transparent bridges, like
>>
>> BRIDGE_A ---- BRIDGE_AA----DEVICE_AA
>>                     |
>>                     \-- BRIDGE_AB ---DEVICE_AB
>>
>> if only BRIDGE_A and BRIDGE_AA are transparent, and BRIDGE_AB is not.
>>
>> and if pci_bridge_supports_io() return false for BRIDGE_A.
>>
>> We will have all three bridges have PCI_BUS_FLAGS_SUPPORTS_IO cleared.
>> so all will not been sized and will not get assigned io port resource.
>>
>> later DEVICE_AA could root bus io port as parent, and get io resource assigned.
>> but DEVICE_AB will not get assigned.
>>
>> so we should get rid of pci_bridge_supports_io(), and just check root
>> resource IO port.
>
> I would suggest this version instead:
>
> Subject: [PATCH] PCI: Only try to assign io port only if root bus support that
>

Bjorn had asked me to move the IO support check out of pci_bridge_check_ranges().
It looks like you want to keep it there.

Can you explain your reasons ? Sorry, I just don't understand.

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/