lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 5 Aug 2015 21:25:03 -0700
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: Only enable IO window if supported

On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> On 08/05/2015 06:38 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> It only can avoid warning with bridge, and still have warning on
>>> devices under the bridge.
>>>
>>> also would have problem on transparent bridges, like
>>>
>>> BRIDGE_A ---- BRIDGE_AA----DEVICE_AA
>>>                     |
>>>                     \-- BRIDGE_AB ---DEVICE_AB
>>>
>>> if only BRIDGE_A and BRIDGE_AA are transparent, and BRIDGE_AB is not.
>>>
>>> and if pci_bridge_supports_io() return false for BRIDGE_A.
>>>
>>> We will have all three bridges have PCI_BUS_FLAGS_SUPPORTS_IO cleared.
>>> so all will not been sized and will not get assigned io port resource.
>>>
>>> later DEVICE_AA could root bus io port as parent, and get io resource
>>> assigned.
>>> but DEVICE_AB will not get assigned.
>>>
>>> so we should get rid of pci_bridge_supports_io(), and just check root
>>> resource IO port.
>>
>>
>> I would suggest this version instead:
>>
>> Subject: [PATCH] PCI: Only try to assign io port only if root bus support
>> that
>>
>
> Bjorn had asked me to move the IO support check out of
> pci_bridge_check_ranges().
> It looks like you want to keep it there.
>
> Can you explain your reasons ? Sorry, I just don't understand.

in pci_alloc_child_bus(), child bus's bus_flags will be assigned with
parent's bus_flags.

so if one parent bus has bridge's io bar can not changed, then all
children bus will also
have same bus_flags, and their bridge io bar will not used.

then if BRIDGE_AB is not transparent, we do need to use it's bridge io bar.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ