lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1438888809.4023.121.camel@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 06 Aug 2015 13:20:09 -0600
From:	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To:	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc:	iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jroedel@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/26] iommu/vt-d: Split up iommu->domains array

On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 17:18 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
> 
> This array is indexed by the domain-id and contains the
> pointers to the domains attached to this iommu. Modern
> systems support 65536 domain ids, so that this array has a
> size of 512kb, per iommu.
> 
> This is a huge waste of space, as the array is usually
> sparsely populated. This patch makes the array
> two-dimensional and allocates the memory for the domain
> pointers on-demand.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  include/linux/intel-iommu.h |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> index e6a5966..7f2e6c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> @@ -569,13 +569,32 @@ static struct kmem_cache *iommu_devinfo_cache;
>  
>  static struct dmar_domain* get_iommu_domain(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did)
>  {
> -	return iommu->domains[did];
> +	struct dmar_domain **domains;
> +	int idx = did >> 8;
> +
> +	domains = iommu->domains[idx];
> +	if (!domains)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	return domains[did & 0xff];
>  }
>  
>  static void set_iommu_domain(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did,
>  			     struct dmar_domain *domain)
>  {
> -	iommu->domains[did] = domain;
> +	struct dmar_domain **domains;
> +	int idx = did >> 8;
> +
> +	if (!iommu->domains[idx]) {
> +		size_t size = 256 * sizeof(struct dmar_domain *);
> +		iommu->domains[idx] = kzalloc(size, GFP_ATOMIC);
> +	}
> +
> +	domains = iommu->domains[idx];
> +	if (WARN_ON(!domains))
> +		return;
> +	else
> +		domains[did & 0xff] = domain;
>  }

I'm tempted to suggest using pages here since we're dealing with 2k
second level arrays, but maybe caring about pointers per page just makes
that ugly.

>  
>  static inline void *alloc_pgtable_page(int node)
> @@ -1528,35 +1547,43 @@ static void iommu_disable_translation(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>  
>  static int iommu_init_domains(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>  {
> -	unsigned long ndomains;
> -	unsigned long nlongs;
> +	u32 ndomains, nlongs;
> +	size_t size;
>  
>  	ndomains = cap_ndoms(iommu->cap);
> -	pr_debug("%s: Number of Domains supported <%ld>\n",
> +	pr_debug("%s: Number of Domains supported <%d>\n",
>  		 iommu->name, ndomains);
>  	nlongs = BITS_TO_LONGS(ndomains);
>  
>  	spin_lock_init(&iommu->lock);
>  
> -	/* TBD: there might be 64K domains,
> -	 * consider other allocation for future chip
> -	 */
>  	iommu->domain_ids = kcalloc(nlongs, sizeof(unsigned long), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!iommu->domain_ids) {
>  		pr_err("%s: Allocating domain id array failed\n",
>  		       iommu->name);
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
> -	iommu->domains = kcalloc(ndomains, sizeof(struct dmar_domain *),
> -			GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!iommu->domains) {
> +
> +	size = ((ndomains >> 8) + 1) * sizeof(struct dmar_domain **);
> +	iommu->domains = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> +	if (iommu->domains) {
> +		size = 256 * sizeof(struct dmar_domain *);
> +		iommu->domains[0] = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!iommu->domains || !iommu->domains[0]) {
>  		pr_err("%s: Allocating domain array failed\n",
>  		       iommu->name);
>  		kfree(iommu->domain_ids);
> +		kfree(iommu->domains);
>  		iommu->domain_ids = NULL;
> +		iommu->domains    = NULL;
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> +
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * If Caching mode is set, then invalid translations are tagged
>  	 * with domain-id 0, hence we need to pre-allocate it. We also
> @@ -1598,6 +1625,11 @@ static void disable_dmar_iommu(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>  static void free_dmar_iommu(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>  {
>  	if ((iommu->domains) && (iommu->domain_ids)) {
> +		int elems = (cap_ndoms(iommu->cap) >> 8) + 1;
> +		int i;
> +
> +		for (i = 0; i < elems; i++)
> +			kfree(iommu->domains[i]);
>  		kfree(iommu->domains);
>  		kfree(iommu->domain_ids);
>  		iommu->domains = NULL;
> diff --git a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> index d9a366d..6240063 100644
> --- a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ struct intel_iommu {
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU
>  	unsigned long 	*domain_ids; /* bitmap of domains */
> -	struct dmar_domain **domains; /* ptr to domains */
> +	struct dmar_domain ***domains; /* ptr to domains */
>  	spinlock_t	lock; /* protect context, domain ids */
>  	struct root_entry *root_entry; /* virtual address */
>  



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ