[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150807092541.GE16853@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 11:25:41 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bigeasy@...utronix.de, tglx@...utronix.de,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v0 0/3] Simple wait queue support
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 06:14:12PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 23:36:49 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 03:31:20PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > > 4) poll_wait: currently it and poll_table_entry are both hard coupled
> > > > to wait_queue_head_t -- so any users of poll_wait are not eligible
> > > > for conversion to simple wait. (I just happened to notice that
> > > > recently.) A quick grep shows ~500 poll_wait users.
> > >
> > > Looks like a good candidate to test the cwait on :-)
> >
> > Poll uses custom wake functions, which disqualifies them on the spot.
>
> For cwait? That's the complex wait queue (what the current wait queues
> will be called in the future).
Urgh, I don't think we should go rename that.. that's going to be lots
of pain for no to little gain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists