linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v0 0/3] Simple wait queue support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150807072954.1b086402@grimm.local.home>
Date:	Fri, 7 Aug 2015 07:29:54 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>,
	linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	bigeasy@...utronix.de, tglx@...utronix.de,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v0 0/3] Simple wait queue support

On Fri, 7 Aug 2015 11:25:41 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:


> > For cwait? That's the complex wait queue (what the current wait queues
> > will be called in the future).
> 
> Urgh, I don't think we should go rename that.. that's going to be lots
> of pain for no to little gain.

I thought we decided that we would have the end result be that the
default be the simple wait queue, and those that need more complexity,
would have a complex wait queue, as IIRC, the simple wait queue can
replace the majority of the existing wait queues.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/