linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND][PATCH 3/4] ARM: davinci: Set proper SPI prescale limit value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55C9BF51.5080401@ti.com>
Date:	Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:54:33 +0530
From:	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:	"Franklin S Cooper Jr." <fcooper@...com>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
	<linux@....linux.org.uk>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
	<pawel.moll@....com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...t.infradead.org>, <ssantosh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH 3/4] ARM: davinci: Set proper SPI prescale limit
 value

On Tuesday 11 August 2015 02:33 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:28:21PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On Tuesday 11 August 2015 05:17 AM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
> 
>>> ping. Patches 1 and 2 have already been pulled into Mark's spi tree and are currently in in linux-next.
> 
>> Mark, can you apply this patch to your tree as well? Thats the preferred
>> route for me.
> 
>> If thats not an option for you, can you confirm that the topic/davinci
>> branch of your spi tree is an immutable commit I can base my pull
>> request to ARM-SoC on?
> 
> Why would there be any interdependency between the the two trees, that
> would be very unusual?  Adding a new value to DT doesn't need the kernel
> to understand it and the driver should be compatible with existing DTs.
> If there *is* some dependency that suggests the driver update has
> problems...

The dependency is because of platform data. Patch 2/4 adds a new
platform data member 'prescaler_limit' which this patch populates for
DaVinci devices using legacy booting.

> In any case I don't have a copy of the patch any more.

I can resend this patch to you with my ack included.

Thanks,
Sekhar

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/