[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150811092810.GK10748@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 10:28:10 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
Cc: "Franklin S Cooper Jr." <fcooper@...com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
khilman@...prootsystems.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
galak@...eaurora.org, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
mark.rutland@....com, pawel.moll@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...t.infradead.org, ssantosh@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH 3/4] ARM: davinci: Set proper SPI prescale limit
value
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 02:54:33PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 August 2015 02:33 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Why would there be any interdependency between the the two trees, that
> > would be very unusual? Adding a new value to DT doesn't need the kernel
> > to understand it and the driver should be compatible with existing DTs.
> > If there *is* some dependency that suggests the driver update has
> > problems...
> The dependency is because of platform data. Patch 2/4 adds a new
> platform data member 'prescaler_limit' which this patch populates for
> DaVinci devices using legacy booting.
Ugh, you still have legacy platforms :(
> > In any case I don't have a copy of the patch any more.
> I can resend this patch to you with my ack included.
I guess.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists