[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55C9D101.8020004@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:40:01 +0100
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
To: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/deadline: fix comment in enqueue_task_dl
Hi,
On 05/08/15 14:56, Andrea Parri wrote:
> The flag "dl_boosted" is set by comparing *absolute* deadlines
> (c.f., rt_mutex_setprio).
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index 7c17001..be2ca5e 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -953,7 +953,7 @@ static void enqueue_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
>
> /*
> * Use the scheduling parameters of the top pi-waiter
> - * task if we have one and its (relative) deadline is
> + * task if we have one and its (absolute) deadline is
> * smaller than our one... OTW we keep our runtime and
> * deadline.
> */
>
Right, thanks for spotting it.
Best,
- Juri
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists