[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55C9F6C8.5010807@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:21:12 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Wei Huang <wei@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gleb@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, joro@...tes.org,
trivial@...nel.org, drjones@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [KVM x86 vPMU Patch 0/2] Two vPMU Trivial Patches
On 07/08/2015 21:53, Wei Huang wrote:
> These two trivial patches are related to x86 vPMU code. They were
> actually suggested by Andrew Jones while he was reviewing the last
> big vPMU patch set.
>
> These patches have been compiled and tested on AMD system using
> a 64-bit guest VM with various perf commands (e.g. bench, test, top,
> stat). No obvious problems were found.
>
> Thanks,
> -Wei
>
> Wei Huang (2):
> KVM: x86/vPMU: Move the definition of kvm_pmu_ops to arch-specific
> files
> KVM: x86/vPMU: Fix unnecessary signed extesion for AMD PERFCTRn
>
> arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h | 2 --
> arch/x86/kvm/pmu_amd.c | 2 --
> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
Applied patch 2. For patch 1 I'm not sure, because I do not really like
1) externs in .c files; 2) globals with no declarations in a .h file.
So I'm leaving it out while I think more about it.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists