[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55CA2AF2.6040202@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:03:46 -0400
From: David Long <dave.long@...aro.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"sandeepa.s.prabhu@...il.com" <sandeepa.s.prabhu@...il.com>,
William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@...aro.org>,
"Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@...aro.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] arm64: Add kernel probes (kprobes) support
On 08/11/15 12:56, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 01:52:37AM +0100, David Long wrote:
>> From: "David A. Long" <dave.long@...aro.org>
>>
>> This patchset is heavily based on Sandeepa Prabhu's ARM v8 kprobes patches,
>> first seen in October 2013. This version attempts to address concerns raised by
>> reviewers and also fixes problems discovered during testing.
>>
>> This patchset adds support for kernel probes(kprobes), jump probes(jprobes)
>> and return probes(kretprobes) support for ARM64.
>>
>> The kprobes mechanism makes use of software breakpoint and single stepping
>> support available in the ARM v8 kernel.
>>
>> This patch depends on:
>> [PATCH 1/2] Move the pt_regs_offset struct definition from arch to common include file
>> [PATCH 2/2] Consolidate redundant register/stack access code
>
> Are these two queued somewhere? This series doesn't even build without
> them.
>
> Will
>
I posted the last revision of that on July 27. I don't know if they're
"queued" somewhere. They do affect multiple architectures so I'm not
certain where they would get queued. They also live in a branch in my
own Linaro repo.
Was there a better way for me to deal with this dependency? I was
reluctant to make this into one patch set as the other patch really does
stand alone as a useful fix.
-dl
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists