linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/20] regmap: Fix regmap_bulk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150812111031.GV10748@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 12 Aug 2015 12:10:31 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Markus Pargmann <mpa@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/20] regmap: Fix regmap_bulk_write for bus writes

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:12:31PM +0200, Markus Pargmann wrote:

> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>

I'm not sure why you're putting this in these commit messages...

>  	if (!map->bus || map->use_single_rw) {
> +		if (val_bytes != 1 && val_bytes != 2 && val_bytes != 4)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +

switch statement please.  This also looks like a separate change to the
handling of single writes.

> +	} else if (map->use_single_rw) {
> +		/*

How are we ever going to fall into this else case?  The first check has
an || map->use_single_rw it so if this is true then the first check will
be too so we'd never end up in this else case.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)