[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150812112707.GY10748@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 12:27:07 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Markus Pargmann <mpa@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/20] regmap: _regmap_raw_read: Add handling of busses
without bus->read()
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:12:36PM +0200, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> + /*
> + * There are busses that do not have a read function as it is optional.
> + * Use their reg_read function instead if the requested number of bytes
> + * is correct.
> + */
> + if (!map->bus->read) {
> + /*
> + * bus_reg_read() does not support reading values that are not
> + * exactly the size of format.val_bytes
> + */
> + if (val_len != map->format.val_bytes)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + return _regmap_bus_reg_read(map, reg, val);
> + }
No, this makes no sense - if the device doesn't have a read operation
then it doesn't support a raw data stream and hence can't support raw
access sensibly. Callers that want to access a lot of registers at once
without knowing what the wire format for the device is should be using
the bulk or multi interfaces.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists