lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150812114931.GZ10748@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 12 Aug 2015 12:49:31 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Markus Pargmann <mpa@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/20] regmap: Introduce max_raw_io for
 regmap_bulk_read/write

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:12:37PM +0200, Markus Pargmann wrote:

> +	/* if set, raw reads/writes are limited to this size */
> +	size_t max_raw_io;
> +

Do this separately for read and write, there's doubtless going to be
something that has asymmetry.

> +		if (!map->use_single_rw) {
> +			write_count = total_bytes / map->max_raw_io;
> +			write_bytes = map->max_raw_io;

We may not be able to fit a whole number of values into whatever the
constraint that the bus has is and partial values don't seem like a good
idea.

> +			reg_stride *= write_bytes / val_bytes;
> +		}

This is very confusing, regmap already has a concept of stride and this
isn't the same thing.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ