[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150813105615.GR3956@byungchulpark-X58A-UD3R>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 19:56:15 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
To: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: sync with the cfs_rq when changing sched class
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:15:28AM +0800, Yuyang Du wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 05:21:27PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> >
> > yuyang said that switched_to don't need to consider task's load because it
> > can have meaningless value. but i think considering task's load is better
> > than leaving it unattended at all. and we can also use switched_to if we
> > consider task's load in switched_to.
>
> when did I say "don't need to consider..."?
>
> Doing more does not mean better, or just trivial. BTW, the task switched_to
> does not have to be switched_from before.
i see.. i need to add initialization routine for fair class..
thanks,
byungchul
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists