[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4869121.dlkq9l8HZc@sifl>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:30:39 -0400
From: Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>
To: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sgrubb@...hat.com, eparis@...hat.com, peter@...3.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V10] fixup: audit: implement audit by executable
On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 11:19:44 AM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 15/08/12, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 05:48:48 AM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > Do you plan to push this fix to next?
> >
> > Patience. Yes, I'll be pushing this to next sometime this week; as usual
> > I'll send mail when I do.
>
> Ok, no problem, I'm not rushing. I was unsure what your intentions were
> or whether there was more to do to help it happen.
It's merged. I still don't know why I'm seeing that error, but the patch is
obviously correct so I'm just going to merge it anyway and chalk it up to some
compiler/sparse oddity.
As far as patch follow-ups, if you haven't heard back from me after four days
or so (yes, that is as arbitrary as it sounds), it isn't a bad idea to send a
follow-up, especially if it is a critical patch, to make sure I've seen the
patch (things do occasionally fall through the cracks). However, if it is
only been a day or two and I haven't responded, rest assured I've likely seen
your patch I'm just dealing with something else at the moment and haven't had
the time to review/comment/merge your patch.
--
paul moore
security @ redhat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists