[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1439485401.19144.19.camel@ssi>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:03:21 -0700
From: Ming Lin <mlin@...nel.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
Dongsu Park <dpark@...teo.net>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] simplify block layer based on immutable biovecs
On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 10:51 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 08/12/2015 01:07 AM, Ming Lin wrote:
> > Hi Jens,
> >
> > Neil/Mike/Martin have acked/reviewed PATCH 1.
> > Now it's ready. Could you please apply this series?
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mlin/linux.git/log/?h=block-generic-req
> >
> > Please note that, for discard, we cap the size at 2G.
> > We'll change it to UINT_MAX after the splitting code in
> > DM thinp is rewritten.
> >
> > v6:
> > - rebase on top of 4.2-rc6+
> > - fix discard/write_same 32bit bi_size overflow issue
> > - add ACKs/Review from Mike/Christoph/Martin/Steven
>
> Why did you rebase it on top of 4.2-rc6+? If you had kept it at 4.2-rc1,
> it would have applied to for-4.3/core a lot more easily. Care to respin
> on top of that?
Because commit bd4aaf8 "dm: fix dm_merge_bvec regression on 32 bit
systems" in 4.2-rc6 conflicted with PATCH 6.
Sure, I can respin on top of 4.2-rc1.
Should I re-post new series to mail list or just update my tree?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists