[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55CCCEC1.7090809@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 11:07:13 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Ming Lin <mlin@...nel.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
Dongsu Park <dpark@...teo.net>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] simplify block layer based on immutable biovecs
On 08/13/2015 11:03 AM, Ming Lin wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 10:51 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 08/12/2015 01:07 AM, Ming Lin wrote:
>>> Hi Jens,
>>>
>>> Neil/Mike/Martin have acked/reviewed PATCH 1.
>>> Now it's ready. Could you please apply this series?
>>>
>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mlin/linux.git/log/?h=block-generic-req
>>>
>>> Please note that, for discard, we cap the size at 2G.
>>> We'll change it to UINT_MAX after the splitting code in
>>> DM thinp is rewritten.
>>>
>>> v6:
>>> - rebase on top of 4.2-rc6+
>>> - fix discard/write_same 32bit bi_size overflow issue
>>> - add ACKs/Review from Mike/Christoph/Martin/Steven
>>
>> Why did you rebase it on top of 4.2-rc6+? If you had kept it at 4.2-rc1,
>> it would have applied to for-4.3/core a lot more easily. Care to respin
>> on top of that?
>
> Because commit bd4aaf8 "dm: fix dm_merge_bvec regression on 32 bit
> systems" in 4.2-rc6 conflicted with PATCH 6.
>
> Sure, I can respin on top of 4.2-rc1.
>
> Should I re-post new series to mail list or just update my tree?
Just repost to me, if you don't want to spam the list again.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists