| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <55CD0F29.4070604@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 14:42:01 -0700 From: Raymond Jennings <shentino@...il.com> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>, Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru>, Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [regression] x86/signal/64: Fix SS handling for signals delivered to 64-bit programs breaks dosemu On 08/13/15 13:09, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote: >> If only I'm not missin something obvious this should not hurt us. >> But I gonna build test kernel and check to be sure tomorrow, ok? > Thanks, > > Linus > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ I am curious about what's supposed to happen normally on signal delivery. Is SS a register that's supposed to be preserved like EIP/RIP and CS when a signal is delivered? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists