lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+5PVA7NncRa1Fm+Z5aLAUugurtEo_3zC_LkzW2htHOUi77gQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 16:52:27 -0400
From:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
To:	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
Cc:	Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...glemail.com>,
	Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...ndz.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdbus: create /sys/fs/kdbus with sysfs_create_mount_point()

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:23 PM, David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk> wrote:
>> Since 0cbee99269 user-namespace pull, if a kdbusfs is mounted on a
>> location that's not created with sysfs_create_mount_point the user
>> namespaces are not allowed to mount their sysfs instances.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
>> ---
>> Applies on top of char-misc/kdbus a36324913.
>
> This does not apply on top of char-misc/kdbus. The tree lacks the
> necessary commits. But yeah, it's required for 4.2. I'll keep it
> starred until Greg back-merges 4.2.
>
> Anyway, this is still: Reviewed-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>

Grumble.  Keeping track of this is getting to be somewhat of a pain.
Why isn't the kdbus-next branch already at 4.2?

So if one was carrying the contents of char-misc/kdbus as stand-alone
patches on top of 4.2-rc7, should your Reviewed-by count as "yes,
apply this patch in that instance?"

josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ