[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55D24FEA.1000803@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 14:19:38 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Chandramouli Narayanan <mouli@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations
On 08/17/2015 01:44 PM, Tim Chen wrote:
> @@ -401,6 +402,7 @@ extern const char * const x86_bug_flags[NBUGINTS*32];
> #define cpu_has_eager_fpu boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_EAGER_FPU)
> #define cpu_has_topoext boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT)
> #define cpu_has_bpext boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_BPEXT)
> +#define cpu_has_sha_ni boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SHA_NI)
I think we're trying not to add these cpu_has_* macros any more. For
MPX at least we were encouraged to call cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_*) directly.
In the patch description, it might also be nice to remind folks that
this will feature will also show up as "sha_ni" in /proc/cpuinfo.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists