[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55D2E8FE.7090008@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:12:46 +0200
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>,
Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@...labora.co.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: exynos_defconfig: Enable CROS_EC_PROTO for ChromeOS
EC mfd driver
Hello Krzysztof,
On 08/18/2015 10:09 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 18.08.2015 17:05, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> Hello Krzysztof,
>>
>> On 08/18/2015 09:57 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 18.08.2015 16:01, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>>> The ChromeOS mfd driver (MFD_CROS_EC) select the CROS_EC_PROTO config
>>>> symbol because the driver uses some communication helper functions in
>>>> drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c but other drivers depends on
>>>> CROS_EC_PROTO instead. Mixing select and depends can lead to circular
>>>> Kconfig dependencies so the MFD_CROS_EC select should be changed to a
>>>> depends on CROS_EC_PROTO instead.
>>>>
>>>> But doing so will break git bisect-ability since MFD_CROS_EC will not
>>>> be enabled anymore unless the default configs first explicitly enable
>>>> the CROS_EC_PROTO dependency.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig | 1 +
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> I saw the discussion about circular dependency but I wasn't following
>>> it. Currently the CROS_EC_PROTO is not user-selectable. How can you
>>> depend on it? How can be enabled on different configs (customized by user)?
>>>
>>> Maybe the questions are answered by code in different patches?
>>
>> Yes, that's why I posted "[PATCH] platform/chrome: Make CROS_EC_PROTO
>> a user selectable option" [0].
>>
>> I posted as separate patches because there isn't a dependency between
>> them and once all the defconfig patches and the patch to make the
>> CROS_EC_PROTO symbol user selectable lands, I'll post the patch to
>> change select for depends on to avoid a regression.
>
> Makes sense now.
>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
>
Thanks!
>>
>> Maybe I should had posted as a series (or at least cc all the people
>> in all the patches) to not left these questions unanswered...
>
> Yep, Cc-ing or a short cover letter would probably answer my question. :)
>
Yes, sorry about that.
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists