[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150818174718.GA15739@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:47:18 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
Eryu Guan <eguan@...hat.com>, xfs@....sgi.com, axboe@...com,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH block/for-linus] writeback: fix syncing of I_DIRTY_TIME
inodes
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:16:03AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 17-08-15 16:02:54, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello, Jan.
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 01:14:09PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > So the patch looks good to me. But the fact that is fixes Eryu's problem
> > > means there is something fishy going on. Either inodes get wrongly attached
> >
> > Seriously, it shouldn't affect size syncing or xfs but then again my
> > understanding of xfs is severely limited.
>
> Well, i_size == 0 in XFS usually means that writeback didn't get to
> flushing delay allocated pages - inode size on disk gets increased only
> after the pages are written out in ->end_io callback. So at least this part
> makes some sense to me.
Hmm... the only possibility I can think of is tot_write_bandwidth
being zero when it shouldn't be. I've been staring at the code for a
while now but nothing rings a bell. Time for another debug patch, I
guess.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists