[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150818195439.GB15739@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 12:54:39 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
Eryu Guan <eguan@...hat.com>, xfs@....sgi.com, axboe@...com,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH block/for-linus] writeback: fix syncing of I_DIRTY_TIME
inodes
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 10:47:18AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hmm... the only possibility I can think of is tot_write_bandwidth
> being zero when it shouldn't be. I've been staring at the code for a
> while now but nothing rings a bell. Time for another debug patch, I
> guess.
So, I can now reproduce the bug (it takes a lot of trials but lowering
the number of tested files helps quite a bit) and instrumented all the
early exit paths w/o the fix patch. bdi_has_dirty_io() and
wb_has_dirty_io() are never out of sync with the actual dirty / io
lists even when the test 048 fails, so the bug at least is not caused
by writeback skipping due to buggy bdi/wb_has_dirty_io() result.
Whenever it skips, all the lists are actually empty (verified while
holding list_lock).
One suspicion I have is that this could be a subtle timing issue which
is being exposed by the new short-cut path. Anything which adds delay
seems to make the issue go away. Dave, does anything ring a bell?
As for the proposed I_DIRTY_TIME fix, I think it'd be a good idea to
merge it. It fixes a clear brekage regardless of this xfs issue.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists