[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150817224552.43d7267d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 22:45:52 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: arnd@...db.de, linux@....linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@....com,
will.deacon@....com, ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp, monstr@...str.eu,
jonas@...thpole.se, cmetcalf@...hip.com, gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn,
x86@...nel.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: provide more common DMA API functions V2
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 07:38:25 +0200 Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 02:24:29PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 110254 bytes saved, shrinking the kernel by a whopping 0.17%.
> > Thoughts?
>
> Sounds fine to me.
OK, I'll clean it up a bit, check that each uninlining actually makes
sense and then I'll see how it goes.
> >
> > I'll merge these 5 patches for 4.3. That means I'll release them into
> > linux-next after 4.2 is released.
>
> So you only add for-4.3 code to -next after 4.2 is odd? Isn't thast the
> wrong way around?
Linus will be releasing 4.2 in 1-2 weeks and until then, linux-next is
supposed to contain only 4.2 material. Once 4.2 is released,
linux-next is open for 4.3 material.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists