linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/4] perf tools: Fix buildid processing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1440013244-15898-4-git-send-email-acme@kernel.org>
Date:	Wed, 19 Aug 2015 16:40:43 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] perf tools: Fix buildid processing

From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>

After recording, 'perf record' post-processes the data to determine
which buildids are needed.

That processing must process the data in time order, if possible,
because otherwise dependent events, like forks and mmaps, will not make
sense.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1439994561-27436-4-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com
[ Moved the sample_id_add to after trying to open the events, use pr_warning ]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
index de165a1b9240..20b56eb987f8 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
@@ -521,6 +521,15 @@ static int __cmd_record(struct record *rec, int argc, const char **argv)
 		goto out_child;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Normally perf_session__new would do this, but it doesn't have the
+	 * evlist.
+	 */
+	if (rec->tool.ordered_events && !perf_evlist__sample_id_all(rec->evlist)) {
+		pr_warning("WARNING: No sample_id_all support, falling back to unordered processing\n");
+		rec->tool.ordered_events = false;
+	}
+
 	if (!rec->evlist->nr_groups)
 		perf_header__clear_feat(&session->header, HEADER_GROUP_DESC);
 
@@ -965,9 +974,11 @@ static struct record record = {
 	.tool = {
 		.sample		= process_sample_event,
 		.fork		= perf_event__process_fork,
+		.exit		= perf_event__process_exit,
 		.comm		= perf_event__process_comm,
 		.mmap		= perf_event__process_mmap,
 		.mmap2		= perf_event__process_mmap2,
+		.ordered_events	= true,
 	},
 };
 
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/