[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150820134438.GA18629@leoy-linaro>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:44:38 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: YiPing Xu <xuyiping@...ilicon.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
galak@...eaurora.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
Bintian Wang <bintian.wang@...wei.com>,
haojian.zhuang@...aro.org, Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, guodong.xu@...aro.org,
Jian Zhang <zhangjian001@...ilicon.com>,
Zhenwei Wang <Zhenwei.wang@...ilicon.com>,
Haoju Mo <mohaoju@...ilicon.com>,
Dan Zhao <dan.zhao@...ilicon.com>, kongfei@...ilicon.com,
Guangyue Zeng <zengguangyue@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mailbox: Hi6220: add mailbox driver
Hi Yiping,
Thanks for review, please see below comments.
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 01:42:58PM +0800, YiPing Xu wrote:
> On 2015/8/20 10:53, Leo Yan wrote:
> >Add driver for Hi6220 mailbox, the mailbox communicates with MCU; for
> >sending data, it can support two methods for low level implementation:
> >one is to use interrupt as acknowledge, another is automatic mode which
> >without any acknowledge. These two methods have been supported in the
> >driver. For receiving data, it will depend on the interrupt to notify
> >the channel has incoming message; enhance rx channel's message queue,
> >which is based on the code in drivers/mailbox/omap-mailbox.c.
> >
> >Now mailbox driver is used to send message to MCU to control dynamic
> >voltage and frequency scaling for CPU, GPU and DDR.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
[...]
> >+static int hi6220_mbox_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *msg)
> >+{
> >+ struct hi6220_mbox_chan *mchan = chan->con_priv;
> >+ struct hi6220_mbox *mbox = mchan->parent;
> >+ int irq = mchan->remote_irq;
> >+ u32 *buf = msg;
> >+ unsigned long flags;
> >+ int i;
> >+
> >+ hi6220_mbox_set_status(mchan, HI6220_MBOX_STATUS_TX);
>
> hi6220_mbox_set_status is called in send_data context, and it is
> also called in hi6220_mbox_rx_interrupt and
> hi6220_mbox_tx_interrupt.
>
> no race condition here?
Have thought this question yet when writing code; it will _NOT_
introduce race condition according to below implementation details:
- Every channel have its own slot, so there have no race condition
between channels;
- The channel is unidirectional; so it will be only for tx or rx at
the same time;
- The channel operation is sequential, so it have the sequence as:
For tx: startup -> send_data -> tx_irq (for ack);
For rx: startup -> rx_irq -> recv_data;
Thanks,
Leo Yan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists