linux-kernel - Re: linux-next conflict resolution branch for btrfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150821152340.GA28016@ret>
Date:	Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:23:40 -0400
From:	Chris Mason <clm@...com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	"linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next conflict resolution branch for btrfs

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:45:24AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> 
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 13:39:18 -0400 Chris Mason <clm@...com> wrote:
> >
> > There are a few conflicts for btrfs in linux-next this time.  They are
> > small, but I pushed out the merge commit I'm using here:
> > 
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git next-merge
> 
> Thanks for that.  It seems to have merged OK but maybe it conflicts
> with something later in linux-next.  Unfortunately see my other email
> about a build problem.  I will keep this example merge in mind for
> later.

Ok, sorry about that one.  We probably want the ifdefs up in Tejun's
code, but I'll talk with him about it today and get it fixed up.

Thanks,
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/