[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150821180641.GA30284@ret.event.rightround.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 14:06:41 -0400
From: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: "linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next conflict resolution branch for btrfs
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:45:24AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 13:39:18 -0400 Chris Mason <clm@...com> wrote:
> >
> > There are a few conflicts for btrfs in linux-next this time. They are
> > small, but I pushed out the merge commit I'm using here:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git next-merge
>
> Thanks for that. It seems to have merged OK but maybe it conflicts
> with something later in linux-next. Unfortunately see my other email
> about a build problem. I will keep this example merge in mind for
> later.
Ok, I put the ifdefs in btrfs. Really what I need to do is change
bio_clone to do this work, but that means making sure its the right
thing for dm/md first.
I also added ifdefs for bio->bi_ioc in fs/btrfs/volumes.c, but
another commit in linux-next actually deletes the whole function from
btrfs. I've redone the example merge:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git next-merge
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists