linux-kernel - [PATCH V2 0/3] slub: introducing detached freelist

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150824005727.2947.36065.stgit@localhost>
Date:	Mon, 24 Aug 2015 02:58:15 +0200
From:	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To:	linux-mm@...ck.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	aravinda@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 0/3] slub: introducing detached freelist

REPOST:
 * Only updated comment in patch01 per request of Christoph Lameter.
 * No other objections have been made
 * Prev post: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/135704

NEW use-cases for this API is RCU-free (and still for network NICs).

Introducing what I call detached freelist, for improving the
performance of object freeing in the "slowpath" of kmem_cache_free_bulk,
which calls __slab_free().

The benchmarking tool are avail here:
 https://github.com/netoptimizer/prototype-kernel/tree/master/kernel/mm
 See: slab_bulk_test0{1,2,3}.c

Compared against existing bulk-API (in AKPMs tree), we see a small
regression for small size bulking (between 2-5 cycles), but a huge
improvement for the slowpath.

bulk- Bulk-API-before           - Bulk-API with patchset
  1 -  42 cycles(tsc) 10.520 ns - 47 cycles(tsc) 11.931 ns - improved -11.9%
  2 -  26 cycles(tsc)  6.697 ns - 29 cycles(tsc)  7.368 ns - improved -11.5%
  3 -  22 cycles(tsc)  5.589 ns - 24 cycles(tsc)  6.003 ns - improved -9.1%
  4 -  19 cycles(tsc)  4.921 ns - 22 cycles(tsc)  5.543 ns - improved -15.8%
  8 -  17 cycles(tsc)  4.499 ns - 20 cycles(tsc)  5.047 ns - improved -17.6%
 16 -  69 cycles(tsc) 17.424 ns - 20 cycles(tsc)  5.015 ns - improved 71.0%
 30 -  88 cycles(tsc) 22.075 ns - 20 cycles(tsc)  5.062 ns - improved 77.3%
 32 -  83 cycles(tsc) 20.965 ns - 20 cycles(tsc)  5.089 ns - improved 75.9%
 34 -  80 cycles(tsc) 20.039 ns - 28 cycles(tsc)  7.006 ns - improved 65.0%
 48 -  76 cycles(tsc) 19.252 ns - 31 cycles(tsc)  7.755 ns - improved 59.2%
 64 -  86 cycles(tsc) 21.523 ns - 68 cycles(tsc) 17.203 ns - improved 20.9%
128 -  97 cycles(tsc) 24.444 ns - 72 cycles(tsc) 18.195 ns - improved 25.8%
158 -  96 cycles(tsc) 24.036 ns - 73 cycles(tsc) 18.372 ns - improved 24.0%
250 - 100 cycles(tsc) 25.007 ns - 73 cycles(tsc) 18.430 ns - improved 27.0%

Patchset based on top of commit aefbef10e3ae with previous accepted
bulk patchset(V2) applied (avail in AKPMs quilt).

Small note, benchmark run with kernel compiled with .config
CONFIG_FTRACE in-order to use the perf probes to measure the amount of
page bulking into __slab_free().  While running the "worse-case"
testing module slab_bulk_test03.c

---

Jesper Dangaard Brouer (3):
      slub: extend slowpath __slab_free() to handle bulk free
      slub: optimize bulk slowpath free by detached freelist
      slub: build detached freelist with look-ahead


 mm/slub.c |  142 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 112 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/