linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] acpi, apei: use appropriate pgprot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55DB60FA.8050406@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:22:50 -0700
From:	"Zhang, Jonathan Zhixiong" <zjzhang@...eaurora.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"linux-kernel @ vger . kernel . org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-efi @ vger . kernel . org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] acpi, apei: use appropriate pgprot_t to map GHES
 memory



On 8/22/2015 2:24 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
>> From: "Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang" <zjzhang@...eaurora.org>
>>
>> With ACPI APEI firmware first handling, generic hardware error
>> record is updated by firmware in GHES memory region. On an arm64
>> platform, firmware updates GHES memory region with uncached
>> access attribute, and then Linux reads stale data from cache.
>
> This paragraph *still* doesn't parse for me. It's not any English
> I can recognize: what is a 'With ACPI APEI firmware first handling'?
APEI is ACPI Platform Error Interface; it is part of ACPI spec,
defining the aspect of hardware error handling. "firmware first
handling" is a terminology used in APEI. It describes such mechanism
that when hardware error happens, firmware intersects/handles such
hardware error, formulates hardware error record and writes the record
to GHES memory region, notifies the kernel through NMI/interrupt, then
the kernel GHES driver grabs the error record from the GHES memory
region.

>
>> With current code, GHES memory region is mapped with PAGE_KERNEL
>> based on the assumption that cache coherency of GHES memory region
>> is maintained by firmware on all platforms. This assumption is
>> not true for above mentioned arm64 platform.
>>
>> Instead GHES memory region should be mapped with page protection type
>> according to what is returned from arch_apei_get_mem_attribute().
>
> ... plus what this changelog still doesn't mention is the most important part of
> any bug fix description: how does the user notice this in practice and why does he
> care?
The changelog mentioned that Linux would read stale data from cache.
When stale data is read, kernel reports there is no new hardware error
when there actually is. This may lead to further damage in various
scenarios, such as error propagation caused data corruption.
>
> Thanks,
>
> 	Ingo
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

-- 
Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/