[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150825084650.GM19409@x1>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:46:50 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Qipeng Zha <qipeng.zha@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] mfd: update Intel soc PMIC header file to support
Broxton WC PMIC
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015, Qipeng Zha wrote:
> IRQ control registers of Intel Broxton Whisky Cove PMIC are
> separated in two parts, so add secondary IRQ chip.
> And the new member of device will be used in PMC IPC regmap APIs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qipeng Zha <qipeng.zha@...el.com>
> ---
> include/linux/mfd/intel_soc_pmic.h | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/intel_soc_pmic.h b/include/linux/mfd/intel_soc_pmic.h
> index abcbfcf..a730f14 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/intel_soc_pmic.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/intel_soc_pmic.h
> @@ -21,10 +21,15 @@
>
> #include <linux/regmap.h>
>
> +#define INIT_REGMAP_IRQ(_irq, _off, _mask) \
> + [_irq] = { .reg_offset = (_off), .mask = (_mask) }
> +
No, that's not what I asked.
Either this macro is going to be useful to *everyone*, or it's
probably not useful to *anyone*. If it's going to exist, it should
exist in the core header file, not Intel's own.
> struct intel_soc_pmic {
> int irq;
> struct regmap *regmap;
> struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_chip_data;
> + struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_chip_data_level2;
> + struct device *dev;
> };
>
> #endif /* __INTEL_SOC_PMIC_H__ */
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists