[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1508251153090.5160@nippy.intranet>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:54:26 +1000 (AEST)
From: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
To: Rudhresh Kumar J <rudhreshj@...c.in>
cc: schmitzmic@...il.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI: DTC: Removed 0 initialization for statics
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Rudhresh wrote:
> Removed unneccessary initialization of zero to a static variable
>
> Signed-off-by: Rudhresh Kumar J <rudhreshj@...c.in>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/dtc.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/dtc.c b/drivers/scsi/dtc.c
> index 4c74c7b..99164d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/dtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/dtc.c
> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static const struct signature {
>
> static int __init dtc_setup(char *str)
> {
> - static int commandline_current = 0;
> + static int commandline_current;
> int i;
> int ints[10];
>
> @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ __setup("dtc=", dtc_setup);
>
> static int __init dtc_detect(struct scsi_host_template * tpnt)
> {
> - static int current_override = 0, current_base = 0;
> + static int current_override, current_base;
> struct Scsi_Host *instance;
> unsigned int addr;
> void __iomem *base;
>
This issue affects all four copies of this code in the NCR5380 drivers:
drivers/scsi/t128.c: static int commandline_current = 0;
drivers/scsi/t128.c: static int current_override = 0, current_base = 0;
drivers/scsi/dtc.c: static int commandline_current = 0;
drivers/scsi/dtc.c: static int current_override = 0, current_base = 0;
drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.c: static int commandline_current = 0;
drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.c: static int current_override = 0;
drivers/scsi/pas16.c: static int commandline_current = 0;
drivers/scsi/pas16.c: static int current_override = 0;
drivers/scsi/pas16.c: static unsigned short current_base = 0;
And there are more instances of redundant initialization in pas16.c,
NCR5380.c and sun3_scsi.c.
All of these drivers have the same maintainers, so I'd prefer a single
patch to fix this.
You must address your patches to all of the interested parties (see
scripts/get_maintainer.pl).
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists