lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZCGJ3JHxPCaiKkMAGZoxFVY7VbkhkJwBJdiP_452KNLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Aug 2015 09:53:58 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Cc:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>,
	Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] gpio: omap: fixes and improvements

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Grygorii Strashko
<grygorii.strashko@...com> wrote:

> This patch series contains set of trivial fixes and improvements, and also
> patches which fixes wrong APIs usage in atomic context as for -RT as for
> non-RT kernel. The final goal of this series is to make TI OMAP GPIO
> driver compatible with -RT kernel as much as possible.
>
> Patch 1-4: trivial fixes and improvements
> Patch 5: fixes wrong CLK clk_prepare/unprepare APIs usage in atomic contexet

I've applied patches 1-5 with Santosh's ACK and Tony's Tested-by.

> Patch 6(rfc): required to be compatible with -RT kernel, because PM runtime
>  can't be used in atimic context on -RT.
> Patch 7(rfc): This patch converts TI OMAP GPIO driver to use generic irq
>  handler instead of chained IRQ handler. This way OMAP GPIO driver will be
>  compatible with RT kernel where it will be forced thread IRQ handler
>  while in non-RT kernel it still will be executed in HW IRQ context.

Waiting for more feedback here.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ