[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150826130921.GB10956@e104805>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 14:09:21 +0100
From: Javi Merino <javi.merino@....com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Vaishali Thakkar <vthakkar1994@...il.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] thermal: cpu_cooling: Remove usage of devm functions
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 01:51:58PM +0100, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 26-08-15, 13:47, Javi Merino wrote:
> > I missed this because I wasn't CCed :( Thankfully, I'll be in
> > MAINTAINERS for this soon.
>
> Yeah, I need to resend that patch soon :)
>
> > > - devm_kfree(&cdev->device, load_cpu);
> >
> > This introduces a memory leak. Keep the kfree() here, you can't drop
> > it. Cheers,
> > Javi
> >
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > *power = static_power + dynamic_power;
> > > return 0;
> > > +
> > > +free:
> > > + kfree(load_cpu);
>
> Wouldn't this make that work ?
Nope, you're not reaching that code path from there. Removing the
"return 0" would work, but I don't like it, since we would be calling
kfree() all the time, even when the trace is not enabled. I'd rather
leave the kfree() where it is.
Cheers,
Javi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists