[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150827144727.GB3596@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:47:27 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
"Kweh, Hock Leong" <hock.leong.kweh@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] firmware_class: split out transaction helpers
On Wed, 29 Apr, at 04:10:52PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> From: James Bottomley <JBottomley@...n.com>
>
> The firmware class contains code to manage an arbitrary sized buffer for
> discrete read and write operations. We need precisely this ability to update
> firmware capsule files (and likely for other transactions as well), so split
> out the capability into a library helper
>
> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@...n.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/firmware_class.c | 117 ++++---------------------------
> include/linux/transaction_helper.h | 26 +++++++
> lib/Makefile | 2 +-
> lib/transaction_helper.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 179 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 include/linux/transaction_helper.h
> create mode 100644 lib/transaction_helper.c
(Sorry, I'm coming to this incredibly late)
This patch is pretty neat and I wish something like this had existed
when I originally wrote the EFI capsule patches.
James, do you have any plans to resubmit this as a non-RFC? If not, do
you mind if I pick this up and rebase my capsule patches ontop of it?
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists