linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2 RESEND] power: reset: Add syscon reboot/poweroff device nodes for APM X-Gene platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADaLNDk5FT8ENQfiMQ+++NGg3VhuiTpnQtGW0L5DMYAuDKZ27g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 28 Aug 2015 13:00:03 -0700
From:	Duc Dang <dhdang@....com>
To:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc:	Loc Ho <lho@....com>, Tai Nguyen <ttnguyen@....com>,
	"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"patches@....com" <patches@....com>, Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 RESEND] power: reset: Add syscon reboot/poweroff
 device nodes for APM X-Gene platform

On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 11:34:42AM -0700, Duc Dang wrote:
> > Hi Olof,
> >
> > We are debating whether we should setup a company server (where we can
> > have full control about storage, user permissions, backup, ...) or
> > just use github.com to host our X-Gene kernel tree.
> >
> > Github seems already provide everything we need for a public source
> > tree. Per your experience, what is your (and probably other
> > maintainers) reference in git hosting server? Is there any
> > inconvenience or difficulty for the maintainers to pull/merge code
> > from Github versus from a company server?
>
> Hosting on github is fine with us in general. We do prefer to get
> signed pull requests in particular when they come from other sources
> than kernel.org, mostly because there's another third party involved in
> hosting the repo and by using signed tags there's less room for anyone
> to do bad stuff with the repository without someone noticing.
>
> If you host on github, please still use native git pull requests and not the
> ones that github provides via the web interface.
>
> Note however, that given the total volume of patches there's no strong need for
> you to have a public repo just to send code to us -- we're happy applying
> patches at the volumes we're currently looking at. I can imagine other reasons
> for why you would like to have a public repo though.

Hi Olof,

I have APM X-Gene git ready on github. According to your response
above, I need to
send a signed pull request. I created a PGP key on public server
(https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=duc+dang&op=index) and signed the tag on
APM X-Gene tree with my key.

Please let me know if I need anything else before sending the git pull
request to you.
My key is not signed by any maintainer yet, would you mind to arrange some
time next week to meet and help sign my key as well?

>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Olof

-- 
Thanks and regards,
Duc Dang.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/