linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2 RESEND] power: reset: Add syscon reboot/poweroff device nodes for APM X-Gene platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADaLNDkaoFC-Hj7fk+iadm0tuimpNG6C3TqoLBBanEZ=gnntJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:51:18 -0700
From:	Duc Dang <dhdang@....com>
To:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc:	Loc Ho <lho@....com>, Tai Nguyen <ttnguyen@....com>,
	"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"patches@....com" <patches@....com>, Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 RESEND] power: reset: Add syscon reboot/poweroff
 device nodes for APM X-Gene platform

On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 11:34:42AM -0700, Duc Dang wrote:
>> Hi Olof,
>>
>> We are debating whether we should setup a company server (where we can
>> have full control about storage, user permissions, backup, ...) or
>> just use github.com to host our X-Gene kernel tree.
>>
>> Github seems already provide everything we need for a public source
>> tree. Per your experience, what is your (and probably other
>> maintainers) reference in git hosting server? Is there any
>> inconvenience or difficulty for the maintainers to pull/merge code
>> from Github versus from a company server?
>
> Hosting on github is fine with us in general. We do prefer to get
> signed pull requests in particular when they come from other sources
> than kernel.org, mostly because there's another third party involved in
> hosting the repo and by using signed tags there's less room for anyone
> to do bad stuff with the repository without someone noticing.
>
> If you host on github, please still use native git pull requests and not the
> ones that github provides via the web interface.
>
> Note however, that given the total volume of patches there's no strong need for
> you to have a public repo just to send code to us -- we're happy applying
> patches at the volumes we're currently looking at. I can imagine other reasons
> for why you would like to have a public repo though.
>

Thanks for the information, Olof.

We are setting up a public repo on Github. I will make sure that
native git pull request is used.

I will need your help in signing the PGP key when the repo is ready.

>
> Thanks,
>
> -Olof

-- 
Regards,
Duc Dang.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/