linux-kernel - RE: [scsi 5/7 RESEND] scsi_debug: schedule

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B3D432483@hasmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Sun, 30 Aug 2015 10:36:52 +0000
From:	"Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
To:	"emilne@...hat.com" <emilne@...hat.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
CC:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: RE: [scsi 5/7 RESEND] scsi_debug: schedule_resp fix input variable
 check

> > >
> > >
> > > I'm just not sure why the patches are not merged or even rejected.
> >
> > Because ideally I want a Maintainer ack.  That's Doug Gilbert.

James 
The patches were discussed and the ACked by Doug in February and reviewed again after resend  by Martin Petersen 

> >
> > > I'm submitting patches to the Linux kernel for more than 10 years to
> > > various trees and  I can agree that these are not some  urgent fixes,
> > > but  this is the first time my effort is ignored for such long time by
> > > the maintainer.
> >
> > Well, OK, I trust martin, I'll override the lack of Maintainer ack if
> > you fix as Ewan suggests.

> 
> Just to clarify, I didn't have a problem with Tomas' patch per se, it's
> just that my patch won't apply on top of his.  I'll submit a v2 if you
> want, so you can apply Tomas' patch first.  The problem I'm fixing has
> been in there for a while.  Let me know if you want me to do that.
> 
Hopefully your patch should be applied above my patches but I can make that effort and stack them on top of yours.
Thanks