linux-kernel - Re: [scsi 5/7 RESEND] scsi_debug: schedule

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1440953692.2204.35.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
Date:	Sun, 30 Aug 2015 09:54:52 -0700
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To:	"Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
Cc:	"emilne@...hat.com" <emilne@...hat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [scsi 5/7 RESEND] scsi_debug: schedule_resp fix input variable
 check

On Sun, 2015-08-30 at 10:36 +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm just not sure why the patches are not merged or even rejected.
> > >
> > > Because ideally I want a Maintainer ack.  That's Doug Gilbert.
> 
> James 
> The patches were discussed and the ACked by Doug in February

7/7 wasn't.

>  and reviewed again after resend  by Martin Petersen 

Yes, that's why I'm willing to override the lack of maintainer ack.
I'll give Doug until Monday first.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/