linux-kernel - RE: [scsi 5/7 RESEND] scsi_debug: schedule

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B3D43282E@hasmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 31 Aug 2015 08:07:42 +0000
From:	"Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
CC:	"emilne@...hat.com" <emilne@...hat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Douglas Gilbert" <dgilbert@...erlog.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: RE: [scsi 5/7 RESEND] scsi_debug: schedule_resp fix input variable
 check

> 
> On Sun, 2015-08-30 at 10:36 +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm just not sure why the patches are not merged or even rejected.
> > > >
> > > > Because ideally I want a Maintainer ack.  That's Doug Gilbert.
> >
> > James
> > The patches were discussed and the ACked by Doug in February
> 
> 7/7 wasn't.
James, fair enough,  the reset though can be merged, right ? 

> 
> >  and reviewed again after resend  by Martin Petersen
> 
> Yes, that's why I'm willing to override the lack of maintainer ack.
> I'll give Doug until Monday first.

Okay.

Thanks
Tomas