linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL 00/32] perf tools: filtering events using eBPF programs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150831135912.GB16351@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 31 Aug 2015 10:59:12 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Cc:	Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>, brendan.d.gregg@...il.com,
	daniel@...earbox.net, dsahern@...il.com, hekuang@...wei.com,
	jolsa@...nel.org, xiakaixu@...wei.com,
	masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, namhyung@...nel.org,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, lizefan@...wei.com, pi3orama@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 00/32] perf tools: filtering events using eBPF programs

Em Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 05:25:27PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu:
> On 8/28/15 12:05 AM, Wang Nan wrote:
> >This time I adjust all Cc and Link field in each patch.

> >Four new patches (1,2,3,12/32) is newly introduced for fixing a bug
> >related to '--filter' option. Patch 06/32 is also modified. Please keep
> >an eye on it.
 
> Arnaldo, what is the latest news on this set?
> I think you've looked at most of them over the last months and few patch
> reorders were necessary. Is it all addressed ? All further work is
> sadly blocked, because these core patches need to come in first.
> I took another look today and to me patches 1-30 look good.

I asked Ingo if he had anything else to mention about changelog format
so that I could try pulling it directly, i.e. I need give it a last
look, and this is not a per-patchkit cost, its just fine tuning that
_should_ make processing subsequent patchkits faster, by pulling instead
of me going thru each patch.

But I disagree it "prevents further work", nobody has to wait for
everything to get upstream to do work, anyway, it will be processed.

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/