lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1441030181-102193-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com>
Date:	Mon, 31 Aug 2015 14:09:41 +0000
From:	Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
To:	<acme@...nel.org>, <jolsa@...nel.org>, <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <lizefan@...wei.com>,
	<pi3orama@....com>, Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] perf tools: Fix cross compiling error

Cross compiling perf to other platform failed due to missing symbol:

  ...
  AR       /pathofperf/libperf.a
  LD       /pathofperf/tests/perf-in.o
  LD       /pathofperf/perf-in.o
  LINK     /pathofperf/perf
/pathofperf/libperf.a(libperf-in.o): In function `intel_pt_synth_branch_sample':
/usr/src/kernel/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c:899: undefined reference to `tsc_to_perf_time'
/pathofperf/libperf.a(libperf-in.o): In function `intel_pt_synth_transaction_sample':
/usr/src/kernel/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c:992: undefined reference to `tsc_to_perf_time'
/pathofperf/libperf.a(libperf-in.o): In function `intel_pt_synth_instruction_sample':
/usr/src/kernel/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c:943: undefined reference to `tsc_to_perf_time'
  ...

This is because we allow newly introduced intel-pt-decoder to be
compiled to not only X86, but tsc.c which required by it is compiled
for x86 only.

This patch fix the compiling error by allow tsc.c to be compiled if
CONFIG_AUXTRACE is set, no matter the target platform.

Comment from Arnaldo:

There were some changes in this area, i.e. x86 needs tsc, and auxtrace
as well, so both should express that via:

 libperf-$(CONFIG_X86) += tsc.o
 libperf-$(CONFIG_AUXTRACE) += tsc.o

Because on !x86 we want to process perf.data files containing Intel PT.

Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/Build | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/Build b/tools/perf/util/Build
index fd2f084..e712311 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/Build
+++ b/tools/perf/util/Build
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ libperf-y += record.o
 libperf-y += srcline.o
 libperf-y += data.o
 libperf-$(CONFIG_X86) += tsc.o
+libperf-$(CONFIG_AUXTRACE) += tsc.o
 libperf-y += cloexec.o
 libperf-y += thread-stack.o
 libperf-$(CONFIG_AUXTRACE) += auxtrace.o
-- 
1.8.3.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ